Show simple item record

United States, China, and Russia: The fight for maritime resources

Estados Unidos, China y Rusia: la lucha por los recursos marítimos

dc.creatorUquillas Prieto , Camilo
dc.creatorSandoval Quintero, Juan Felipe
dc.date2024-12-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-09T13:49:52Z
dc.date.available2025-06-09T13:49:52Z
dc.identifierhttps://esdegrevistas.edu.co/index.php/rema/article/view/4916
dc.identifier10.25062/2500-4735.4916
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14205/11601
dc.descriptionDespite having the three largest and most powerful navies in the world, the maritime reality of the United States, China and Russia is considerably different, given their geopolitical situation, the objectives of their military agendas and the alliances and conflicts that characterize their political-military positioning. This article analyzes each of these cases in terms of their geographic situation and their maritime strategy, in order to understand the risks and possibilities of a possible international conflict in the Arctic, a region in which the three powers have shown a growing interest, due to its natural resources and its strategic position in political, military and economic terms. The growing strategic value of the sea and its resources in the medium and long term is evident.en-US
dc.descriptionA pesar de tener las tres marinas más grandes y poderosas del mundo, la realidad marítima de Estados Unidos, China y Rusia es considerablemente distinta, dada su situación geopolítica, los objetivos de sus agendas militares y las alianzas y conflictos que caracterizan su posicionamiento en el ámbito político-militar. Este artículo analiza cada uno de estos casos en términos de su situación geográfica y su estrategia marítima, con el fin de entender los riesgos y posibilidades de un posible conflicto internacional en el Ártico, una región por la que las tres potencias han demostrado un creciente interés, debido a sus recursos naturales y su posición estratégica en términos políticos, militares y económicos. Se evidencia el cada vez mayor valor estratégico del mar y sus recursos a mediano y largo plazo.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherSello Editorial ESDEGes-ES
dc.relationhttps://esdegrevistas.edu.co/index.php/rema/article/view/4916/5337
dc.relation/*ref*/Cancian, M. (2022). Navy. En U.S. military forces in FY 2022: Peering into the abyss.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cronin, P. M., & Neuhard, R. (2020). China’s political warfare campaign in the South China Sea. En Total competition: China’s challenge in the South China Sea (pp. 14-28). Center for a New American Security. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20439.5
dc.relation/*ref*/DW News. (2023, 28 de agosto). Geopolitical tensions between NATO and Russia increase in the Arctic [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxqQqfDJ1Bc
dc.relation/*ref*/Fravel, M. T. (2014). U.S. policy towards the disputes in the South China Sea since 1995. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hassam, M. (2019). Growing China-India competition in the Indian Ocean: Implications for Pakistan. Strategic Studies, 78.
dc.relation/*ref*/Michel, J. (2011). Baltic security: Why the United States (still) cares. En Nordic-Baltic security in the 21st century: The regional agenda and the global role. Atlantic Council.
dc.relation/*ref*/Murphy, M., & Schaub, G. (2018). Sea of peace or sea of war: Russian maritime hybrid warfare in the Baltic Sea. Naval War College Review, 71(2), 122-148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26607049
dc.relation/*ref*/Strating, B. (2020). Setting the context: The South China Sea disputes. En Defending the maritime rules-based order: Regional responses to the South China Sea disputes. East-West Center.
dc.relation/*ref*/Tobin, L. (2018). Underway: Beijing’s strategy to build China into a maritime great power. U.S. Naval War College.
dc.relation/*ref*/World Directory of Modern Military Warships (WDMMW). (2023). Ranking 2023. https://www.wdmmw.org/ranking.php
dc.relation/*ref*/Zimmerman, J. (2018). High north and high stakes: The Svalbard Archipelago could be the epicenter of rising tension in the Arctic. PRISM: Institute for National Strategic Security, National Defense University, 107.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cancian, M. (2022). Navy. En U.S. military forces in FY 2022: Peering into the abyss.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cronin, P. M., & Neuhard, R. (2020). China’s political warfare campaign in the South China Sea. En Total competition: China’s challenge in the South China Sea (pp. 14-28). Center for a New American Security. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20439.5
dc.relation/*ref*/DW News. (2023, 28 de agosto). Geopolitical tensions between NATO and Russia increase in the Arctic [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxqQqfDJ1Bc
dc.relation/*ref*/Fravel, M. T. (2014). U.S. policy towards the disputes in the South China Sea since 1995. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hassam, M. (2019). Growing China-India competition in the Indian Ocean: Implications for Pakistan. Strategic Studies, 78.
dc.relation/*ref*/Michel, J. (2011). Baltic security: Why the United States (still) cares. En Nordic-Baltic security in the 21st century: The regional agenda and the global role. Atlantic Council.
dc.relation/*ref*/Murphy, M., & Schaub, G. (2018). Sea of peace or sea of war: Russian maritime hybrid warfare in the Baltic Sea. Naval War College Review, 71(2), 122-148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26607049
dc.relation/*ref*/Strating, B. (2020). Setting the context: The South China Sea disputes. En Defending the maritime rules-based order: Regional responses to the South China Sea disputes. East-West Center.
dc.relation/*ref*/Tobin, L. (2018). Underway: Beijing’s strategy to build China into a maritime great power. U.S. Naval War College.
dc.relation/*ref*/World Directory of Modern Military Warships (WDMMW). (2023). Ranking 2023. https://www.wdmmw.org/ranking.php
dc.relation/*ref*/Zimmerman, J. (2018). High north and high stakes: The Svalbard Archipelago could be the epicenter of rising tension in the Arctic. PRISM: Institute for National Strategic Security, National Defense University, 107.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2024 Revista Ensayos sobre Estrategia Marítimaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceEnsayos sobre Estrategia Marítima; Vol. 8 Núm. 20 (2024): La tecnología en la aplicación de la estrategia marítima; 155-164es-ES
dc.source2981-3026
dc.source2500-4735
dc.subjectfuerza navales-ES
dc.subjectgeopolíticaes-ES
dc.subjectocéano Árticoes-ES
dc.subjectpoder marítimoes-ES
dc.subjectrecursos marítimoses-ES
dc.subjectArtic oceanen-US
dc.subjectgeopoliticsen-US
dc.subjectmaritime resourcesen-US
dc.subjectnavy; sea poweren-US
dc.titleUnited States, China, and Russia: The fight for maritime resourcesen-US
dc.titleEstados Unidos, China y Rusia: la lucha por los recursos marítimoses-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record