Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

A proposal for sustaining the Centre for the Development of Naval Technology (CEDNAV) through the licensing of technological innovations

Propuesta de sostenibilidad para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) mediante el licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas

dc.creatorJiménez Navia, Breyner
dc.date2024-12-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-09T13:49:55Z
dc.date.available2025-06-09T13:49:55Z
dc.identifierhttps://esdegrevistas.edu.co/index.php/rema/article/view/4926
dc.identifier10.25062/2500-4735.4926
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14205/11605
dc.descriptionThe Center for Naval Technological Development (CEDNAV) of the Colombian Navy faces the challenge of ensuring its long-term sustainability and strengthening its capacity to develop and transfer innovative technologies to the defense sector. This study analyzes the importance of implementing a technological innovation licensing model as a sustainability strategy for the CEDNAV, through a systematic review of the literature on technological innovation licensing models applied in technological development centers at the international level. In addition, the main barriers and opportunities in the implementation of these models in the defense sector are examined, considering the experience of several countries. As a result, a wide range of licensing models was revealed, including approaches such as open innovation, strategic licensing, collaboration and knowledge sharing, performance-based licensing and socially responsible licensing.en-US
dc.descriptionEl Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) de la Armada Nacional de Colombia enfrenta el desafío de garantizar su sostenibilidad a largo plazo y fortalecer su capacidad para desarrollar y transferir tecnologías innovadoras al sector defensa. Este estudio analiza la importancia de implementar un modelo de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas como estrategia de sostenimiento para el CEDNAV, mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre modelos de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas aplicados en centros de desarrollo tecnológico a nivel internacional. Además, se examinan las principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de estos modelos en el sector defensa, considerando la experiencia de varios países. Como resultado, se reveló una amplia gama de modelos de licenciamiento, incluyendo enfoques como la innovación abierta, el licenciamiento estratégico, la colaboración y el intercambio de conocimientos, el licenciamiento basado en el desempeño y el licenciamiento socialmente responsable.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherSello Editorial ESDEGes-ES
dc.relationhttps://esdegrevistas.edu.co/index.php/rema/article/view/4926/5338
dc.relation/*ref*/Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. The MIT Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Caviggioli, F., & Ughetto, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.022
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3-28). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
dc.relation/*ref*/Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2019). Specializing in generality: Firm strategies when intermediate markets work. Organization Science, 30(1), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1243
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Fosfuri, A. (2006). The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.562
dc.relation/*ref*/Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., & Luzzi, A. (2007). The market for patents in Europe. Research Policy, 36(8), 1163-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333-350.
dc.relation/*ref*/Goldstein, A. (2002). The political economy of high-tech industries in developing countries: Aerospace in Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), 521-538.
dc.relation/*ref*/González-Pérez, M. A., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). South-South cooperation and technology transfer for sustainable development: Lessons from Latin America. Journal of International Development, 32(4), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3474
dc.relation/*ref*/Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property. Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.relation/*ref*/Granstrand, O. (2004). The economics and management of technology trade: Towards a pro-licensing era? International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 209-240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.003953
dc.relation/*ref*/Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2013). Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem. California Management Review, 55(4), 184-210. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.184
dc.relation/*ref*/Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375-423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.375
dc.relation/*ref*/Hartley, K. (2011). The economics of defence policy: A new perspective. Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hoegl, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). Buyer-supplier collaboration in product development projects. Journal of Management, 31(4), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272291
dc.relation/*ref*/Kline, D. (2003). Sharing the corporate crown jewels. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 89-93.
dc.relation/*ref*/Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
dc.relation/*ref*/Lazaric, N., Mérindol, V., & Rochhia, S. (2011). Changes in the French defence innovation system: New roles and capabilities for the Government Agency for Defence. Industry and Innovation, 18(5), 509-530.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.1.75
dc.relation/*ref*/Mani, S. (2011). Promoting knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in India. En A. Szirmai, W. Naudé, & M. Goedhuys (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic development (pp. 168-188). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mazzola, E., Bruccoleri, M., & Perrone, G. (2012). The effect of inbound, outbound and coupled innovation on performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(6), 1240008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919612400087
dc.relation/*ref*/Mimura, C. (2007). Technology licensing for the benefit of the developing world: UC Berkeley's socially responsible licensing program. Industry and Higher Education, 21(4), 295-301. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007781698310
dc.relation/*ref*/Mowery, D. C. (2010). Military R&D and innovation. En B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (vol. 2, pp. 1219-1256). North-Holland.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ortega, H., & Rivera, J. P. (2019). Innovation and technology transfer in Latin America: The challenges of the regional integration. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.10.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Pérez, C., & Truffer, I. (2010). Biotecnología para el desarrollo en América Latina: oportunidades y desafíos. En Innovación y desarrollo: Desafíos para Chile y América Latina. Universidad de Chile.
dc.relation/*ref*/Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage: How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Roijakkers, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks. Research Policy, 35(3), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404
dc.relation/*ref*/Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Sempere, C. M. (2018). Collaborative innovation and intellectual property management: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 8(1-2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2018.090403
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
dc.relation/*ref*/Urraca-Ruiz, A., & Santos, G. A. (2013). The role of public research institutes in the Brazilian innovation system. En E. Albuquerque, W. Suzigan, G. Kruss, & K. Lee (Eds.), Innovative firms in emerging market countries (pp. 71-102). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 281-294). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. The MIT Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Caviggioli, F., & Ughetto, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.022
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3-28). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
dc.relation/*ref*/Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2019). Specializing in generality: Firm strategies when intermediate markets work. Organization Science, 30(1), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1243
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Fosfuri, A. (2006). The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.562
dc.relation/*ref*/Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., & Luzzi, A. (2007). The market for patents in Europe. Research Policy, 36(8), 1163-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333-350.
dc.relation/*ref*/Goldstein, A. (2002). The political economy of high-tech industries in developing countries: Aerospace in Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), 521-538.
dc.relation/*ref*/González-Pérez, M. A., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). South-South cooperation and technology transfer for sustainable development: Lessons from Latin America. Journal of International Development, 32(4), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3474
dc.relation/*ref*/Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property. Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.relation/*ref*/Granstrand, O. (2004). The economics and management of technology trade: Towards a pro-licensing era? International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 209-240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.003953
dc.relation/*ref*/Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2013). Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem. California Management Review, 55(4), 184-210. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.184
dc.relation/*ref*/Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375-423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.375
dc.relation/*ref*/Hartley, K. (2011). The economics of defence policy: A new perspective. Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hoegl, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). Buyer-supplier collaboration in product development projects. Journal of Management, 31(4), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272291
dc.relation/*ref*/Kline, D. (2003). Sharing the corporate crown jewels. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 89-93.
dc.relation/*ref*/Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
dc.relation/*ref*/Lazaric, N., Mérindol, V., & Rochhia, S. (2011). Changes in the French defence innovation system: New roles and capabilities for the Government Agency for Defence. Industry and Innovation, 18(5), 509-530.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.1.75
dc.relation/*ref*/Mani, S. (2011). Promoting knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in India. En A. Szirmai, W. Naudé, & M. Goedhuys (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic development (pp. 168-188). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mazzola, E., Bruccoleri, M., & Perrone, G. (2012). The effect of inbound, outbound and coupled innovation on performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(6), 1240008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919612400087
dc.relation/*ref*/Mimura, C. (2007). Technology licensing for the benefit of the developing world: UC Berkeley's socially responsible licensing program. Industry and Higher Education, 21(4), 295-301. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007781698310
dc.relation/*ref*/Mowery, D. C. (2010). Military R&D and innovation. En B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (vol. 2, pp. 1219-1256). North-Holland.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ortega, H., & Rivera, J. P. (2019). Innovation and technology transfer in Latin America: The challenges of the regional integration. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.10.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Pérez, C., & Truffer, I. (2010). Biotecnología para el desarrollo en América Latina: oportunidades y desafíos. En Innovación y desarrollo: Desafíos para Chile y América Latina. Universidad de Chile.
dc.relation/*ref*/Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage: How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Roijakkers, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks. Research Policy, 35(3), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404
dc.relation/*ref*/Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Sempere, C. M. (2018). Collaborative innovation and intellectual property management: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 8(1-2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2018.090403
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
dc.relation/*ref*/Urraca-Ruiz, A., & Santos, G. A. (2013). The role of public research institutes in the Brazilian innovation system. En E. Albuquerque, W. Suzigan, G. Kruss, & K. Lee (Eds.), Innovative firms in emerging market countries (pp. 71-102). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 281-294). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2024 Revista Ensayos sobre Estrategia Marítimaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceEnsayos sobre Estrategia Marítima; Vol. 8 Núm. 20 (2024): La tecnología en la aplicación de la estrategia marítima; 165-180es-ES
dc.source2981-3026
dc.source2500-4735
dc.subjectArmada Nacionales-ES
dc.subjectdesarrollo tecnológicoes-ES
dc.subjectinnovación tecnológicaes-ES
dc.subjectpropiedad intelectuales-ES
dc.subjectintellectual propertyen-US
dc.subjectNational Navyen-US
dc.subjecttechnological developmenten-US
dc.subjecttechnological innovationen-US
dc.titleA proposal for sustaining the Centre for the Development of Naval Technology (CEDNAV) through the licensing of technological innovationsen-US
dc.titlePropuesta de sostenibilidad para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) mediante el licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicases-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem